Monday, May 01, 2017

Market Outlook | May 1, 2017


“What has puzzled us before seems less mysterious, and the crooked paths look straighter as we approach the end.” Jean Paul Richter (1763-1825)

Stuck with the Familiar

There’s enough professionals and investors in financial services who are left stunned by the simple upward movement of stock prices.  The age old status quo of low interest rates, low volatility and higher stocks market prices remain resoundingly in place, yet again. Beyond so many warnings of calls of a market top from average pundits and well-regarded investors, the stock market has remained strong not only in the US but in Europe as well, with the German stock market up over 8% for 2017.

There is a "bubble" forming somewhere; sure that’s part of any cycle, but the details of how it'll play out have clearly not been realized. Perhaps, the exact “bubble” remains mysterious beyond what's imaginable.

Amazingly, the more the mysterious the unknown, the more the status-quo becomes appealing. Strange psychology indeed. As it relates to the bubble, more common questions are asked: Is the bubble in the low-rate policy of Central Banks? Is the ETF and passive strategy obsession getting overdone? Is the low volatility period about to end? Swirling speculations surely circulate, but have not impacted the market sentiment in an adverse way as some expected. From global worries ranging from Syria to North Korea to changing policies landscapes in key regions, the general sentiment is not breaking down the stock market sentiment easily. Maybe, there's so many concerning issues that investors are becoming numb to worrisome topics. Theories aside, as long as rates remain low in developed markets while emerging markets re-attempt to stand on solid footing, the reinforced idea is to keep assets in developing markets. This preference in developed markets extends from stocks to real estate to the US Dollar. 

Disconnect Revisited

In terms of the real economy, it presents a different story that the bullish financial markets, in which real growth is not visibly vibrant. Long term bond yields are low; in the case of the US 10-year being below 3%, still signals lack of straight. Plus, the results of Trump and Brexit still reflect how the Central Banks’ narrative of crafty words and theoretical chatter fails to paint the reality that's felt by the average voter in the real economy. The ground level realities versus the investment community is creating an earth-shattering disconnect. Of course, in recent years the first quarter data has been weak and first 3 months in 2017 was no different. Trump or Obama is irrelevant, the soft near or below 1% GDP growth signals trouble rather than a robust economy.

Government data is only one way to get a gut check of the economy, but there are misleading factors and trickery that's purely spewing disconnect. This is a common situation that observers are accustomed to by now. The gridlock in Washington DC exhibits further frustration for change seekers; but as Trump is learning, the establishment is quite unbreakable and unfit for rapid policies. So far, the DC gridlock hasn’t bothered bullish participants and, to be fair, the government shutdown few years ago did not bother many investors either. The gridlock in Washington has delayed sound policies that are in favor of business from low regulation to lower taxes. Yet, with implementation taking a while, it is hard to see the revival of the real economy in a meaningful way.


Convenience & Deferral

Amazingly, Trump and Yellen actually are best positioned to ride the current wave rather than derailing the status-quo. Despite Trump being the anti-establishment and “anti-Fed” politician, the hardnosed pre-election comments by Trump are being diluted at a rapid pace. Essentially, having stocks trade around all-time highs is a good spin for political leaders who are desperate to find good news. Similarly, Yellen, who has been ferociously challenged on interest rate polices, is finding that deferring any risk seems easier than confronting reality. Essentially, courageous and bold investors who’ve bet against the Federal Reserve have paid a severe price given the multi-year stock market appreciation. At some point, the natural flow of markets will expose the flaws of low rate policies and the limitation of election officials in making a difference.  


Article Quotes

“While the ECB has six weeks and another round of monthly data to process before its next policy meeting, the latest reports will give ammunition to Governing Council members who have publicly aired their view that the time is near to signal the gradual withdrawal of monetary stimulus. Draghi’s concern is that even discussing the matter too soon, let alone acting, will stymie the recovery.

‘The risks surrounding the euro-area growth outlook, while moving toward a more balanced configuration, are still tilted to the downside,” he said after the Governing Council’s meeting on Thursday, using language that was mildly less dovish than the previous stance. “We have not seen any evidence, or any sufficient evidence, to alter our assessment about the inflation outlook.’ Friday’s inflation data was robust enough to snap a two-day decline for the euro and put it on track for the biggest weekly gain since June. Core price growth, excluding food and energy, accelerated to 1.2 percent in April. That’s the highest reading since June 2013, and the half a percentage point jump from March is the biggest in more than 16 years.” (Bloomberg, April 28, 2017)

“Economist Paulina Restrepo-Echavarria and Senior Research Associate Maria Arias said foreign central banks and other international institutions have been steady buyers of U.S. Treasuries since 2008. However, these institutions have trimmed their holdings of U.S. Treasuries since the size of their holdings peaked in 2015. China and Japan, the two countries holding the most U.S. government debt, had different reasons for reducing their holdings of U.S. Treasuries. ‘China has been selling U.S. Treasuries to defend its yuan in the face of capital outflows due to slower growth,” Restrepo-Echavarria and Arias wrote. “Japan has been swapping Treasuries for cash and T-bills because its prolonged negative interest rates have increased the demand for U.S. dollars.’ Though Treasury holdings by foreign official institutions have declined since 2015, the authors said that U.S. Treasury yields were more or less stable until the latter half of 2016. They noted that the yields on two-year, 10-year and 30-year Treasuries increased 0.24, 0.44 and 0.45 percentage points, respectively, between their lowest point on the week ending July 6 and the week ending Nov. 2.” (St. Louis Federal Reserve, April 20, 2017)

Key Levels: (Prices as of Close: April 28, 2017)

S&P 500 Index [2,384.20] – Approaching March 1st highs of 2,400, which only reinforces the trend of making or hovering around all-time highs.

Crude (Spot) [$49.33] –    After failing to hold above $52, notable sell-offs persisted in March and April.  Crude still struggles to hold above $50.

Gold [$1,266.45] – The uptrend since Mid-December lows of $1,226.95 remains in place. Intermediate positive trends continue to hold.  

DXY – US Dollar Index [99.05] – Although the annual highs of 103.82 have not been reached in several months, still the strength of the Dollar remains.  Of course, the annual lows of 98.69 was reached last week on April 25.

US 10 Year Treasury Yields [2.41%] – March 14, 2017 peak of 2.62% remains the annual peak, since then Yields have retraced in recent trading days. Breaking below 2.20% can trigger some worries and may symbolize risk-aversion.

Dear Readers:

The positions and strategies discussed on MarketTakers are offered for entertainment purposes only, and they are in no way intended to serve as personal investing advice. Readers should not make any investment decisions without first conducting their own, thorough due diligence. Readers should assume that the editor holds a position in any securities discussed, recommended or panned. While the information provided is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed, nor can this publication be, in any Publish Post, considered liable for the future investment performance of any securities or strategies discussed.