Market Outlook | July 25, 2011

“All things are subject to interpretation; whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.” - Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900)

Theatrical Deal Sealing

Obsession and anticipation over deal making is a theme that keeps the summer lively, given this unavoidable topic. At face value, it is easy to say negotiations are ugly as the political spice makes it even uglier. One big weekend deal (or lack of) attempt does not seal other long-term issues. Generally, when a politician talks like a trader by warning of market behavior or when a trader speaks like a government official, then both are equally dangerous. Veterans and shrewd observers would attest to that. In fact, some are calling this debt ceiling event “a manufactured crisis” or simply “artificial,” or other Washingtonian insiders call it a “gimmick.” Bottom-line, running a deficit is nothing new that dates back to World War II, and the Treasury Secretary can steer clear of a default, if needed. The National Center of Policy Analysis reminds us of the following:

“There are approximately $2.6 trillion dollars in the Social Security Trust Fund; those assets can be used to pay benefits. Furthermore, there is already trillions of dollars of interagency debt that counts toward the $14.29 trillion debt limit…. The Treasury Department could also make cash available from the trust fund by "disinvesting" some of the money used to buy government bonds” (NCPA, July 20, 2011).

Posturing methods and threat of a market collapse should be neutrally watched by market observers. In other words, the gloom-and-doom consequences are well laid out (especially with nauseating Eurozone discussions); therefore, a mellow approach is heavily required.

Sensationalism makes for good entertainment and not for a solid money management. Outside the tick-by-tick and day-by-day response to chatter, placing money with high convictions in the next 6 months is the objective and challenge on hand. After all this back and forth, one should seek the actionable ideas while prioritizing noteworthy global indicators beyond the current headline matter.

A Glaring Shine

Gold perceived as a “safer” instrument continues to attract votes via buyers, as showcased by shiny past and present performance. It was July 23, 1999, when Gold bottomed at $252.80. Of course, that was a period where America was infatuated with the tech boom. The 12-year anniversary of Gold’s bottom marks a different world today, with all-time highs at the end of last week at $1602. Importantly, soon after, at the turn of the millennium, interest rates and the dollar started multi-year declines. Clearly, that’s contributed to keeping the Gold party alive and well. Yet, at some point, Gold owners must ask, is this a safe asset to own against, anticipating the dollar collapse, stock market fragility, or alternation in capitalism. Or does it have a historical appeal and can be physically felt? Bringing up these doubts sounds rather unpopular today. For now, the defined reasoning behind the ongoing run is less of a discussion, and that’s too common when momentum is in full gear Nonetheless, few biases and facts need closer evaluation, especially for the next 6-12 months. In other words, safety was one of the catalysts to own Gold, but logic eventually catches up to a frenzy of patterns.

Borderless Index

As known to all by now, borderless-driven competition has redefined the way of evaluating an index. Recently, a report confirmed that companies in the S&P 500 received 46.3% of revenues outside the United States. Notably, US technology companies had the most exposure (56.3%) to foreign sales (S&P Indices, July 2011). These trends seem rather simple and obvious, but they paint one solid picture of today’s realities.

This certainly illustrates a look back into the weakening US growth rate, which by now, doesn’t require advanced quant models to figure out. Importantly, we can point out with confidence that the S&P 500 Index is not a reflection of US economy and clearly not an economic barometer (as stated many times before). At the same time, this reflects the much talked about emerging markets expansion as well as the interlinked nature of financial markets.

Then, there is the domestic social, but really political, matter. Multi-national companies, for the most part, don’t have an allegiance to borders in a globalized world. Rightly or wrongly, this becomes a vexing topic for some patriots, but it becomes a practically stifling issue for American leaders. Not to mention, these company-specific dynamics are powerful enough to alter the behavior of a money manager when it comes to capital allocation. Finally, non US revenue trend touches on key topics related to corporate taxes (to be paid in the US), flow of investment capital, and factors affecting growth rates.

Seeking Answers

For companies with exposure to China, some near-term suspense is warranted. This has many scrambling to decipher soft vs. hard landing matters to the Chinese economy. Inflationary matters have swept the emerging markets, and this certainly is a daily discussion topic for policymakers and investors alike.

Real estate “bubbles” are resurfacing again in China as well as Brazil. The real impact of the housing slowdown is not quite understood, and at times, it is unfairly compared to the US collapse. As for now, it is evident that emerging markets have some turbulence (or skepticism) to overcome in the next few months. Interestingly, the magnitude of any slowdown can provide guidance on two major questions:

1. What will be the impact of further slowdown on earnings of multi-national companies? 2. Will investors rotate to US markets on a relative basis, given increase in the sovereign debt crisis elsewhere?

For now, both are intriguing questions, and they are worth deciphering before placing aggressive bets.

Article Quotes:

“It has been argued that banks do not need to get funds from each other, since they are now awash in reserves; but these reserves are not equally distributed. The 25 largest US banks account for over half of aggregate reserves, with 21% of reserves held by just three banks; and the largest banks have cut back on small business lending by over 50%. Large Wall Street banks have more lucrative things to do with the very cheap credit made available by the Fed than to lend it to businesses and consumers, which has become a risky and expensive business with the imposition of higher capital requirements and tighter regulations…. Fourteen states have now initiated bills to establish state-owned banks or to study their feasibility. Besides serving local lending needs, state-owned banks can provide cash-strapped states with new revenues, obviating the need to raise taxes, slash services or sell off public assets.” (Asian Times, July 21, 2011)

“People on both sides of financing French banks say the cost of debt has not changed substantially, but rather, the availability has diminished and money market funds preferring to lend overnight. Money market lending to Spanish and Italian banks has virtually ceased in the past month as sovereign debt worries have spread to Europe’s larger economies, reported the head of one money market business. At the end of June, banks in the two countries had accounted for 0.8 percent of the $1,570bn assets in prime money market funds, calculates Fitch, down from 6.1 per cent in late 2009.The 10 largest US prime money market funds reduced their total exposure to European banks by 8.7 percent on a dollar basis in June, according to the rating agency. Owners of the money market funds, chastened by a rush of withdrawals during the financial crisis in 2008, have adopted an abundance of caution.” (Financial Times, July 24, 2011)

Levels:

S&P 500 Index [1345.02] – Breaking and staying above around 1340, which has been difficult, as witnessed in February, April, and earlier this month.

Crude [$99.87] – A trend reversal established on June 27 has triggered a recovery back to the $100 level. Doubters are questioning if elevation above $100 is sustainable. Earlier this year, buying severely stalled at $105 and $110.

Gold [$1602] – A 21% rally since the lows of late January registers yet another all-time high—the most profound and well-defined positive trend this year. Since the 2008 crisis in October (24), the commodity has rallied by 124.84%—clearly a declaration of negative sentiment for paper assets. Bubble-like pattern is hard to identify for now.

DXY – US Dollar Index [74.20] – Resumption of downtrend pattern and few points from annual lows, which is critical to watch at 7269. Last four months have showcased moderate stabilization, but conjuring an uptrend is hardly visible.

US 10 Year Treasury Yields [2.96%] – Attempting to break above 3% while staying above 2.80%. A step back further illustrates the established downtrend, which has been in full gear since peaking at 6.82% in 2ooo.

http://markettakers.blogspot.com


Dear Readers:

The positions and strategies discussed on MarketTakers are offered for entertainment purposes only, and they are in no way intended to serve as personal investing advice. Readers should not make any investment decisions without first conducting their own, thorough due diligence. Readers should assume that the editor holds a position in any securities discussed, recommended, or panned. While the information provided is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed, nor can this publication be, in any Publish Post, considered liable for the future investment performance of any securities or strategies discussed.